Skip to main content
Download PDF

Comprehensive genetic testing combined with citizen science reveals a recently characterized ancient MC1R mutation associated with partial recessive red phenotypes in dog

Canine Medicine and Genetics volume 7, Article number: 16 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The Melanocortin 1 Receptor (MC1R) plays a central role in regulation of coat color determination in various species and is commonly referred to as the “E (extension) Locus”. Allelic variation of the MC1R gene is associated with coat color phenotypes EM (melanistic mask), EG (grizzle/domino) and e1–3 (recessive red) in dogs. In addition, a previous study of archeological dog specimens over 10,000 years of age identified a variant p.R301C in the MC1R gene that may have influenced coat color of early dogs.

Results

Commercial genotyping of 11,750 dog samples showed the R301C variant of the MC1R gene was present in 35 breeds or breed varieties, at an allele frequency of 1.5% in the tested population. We detected no linkage disequilibrium between R301C and other tested alleles of the E locus. Based on current convention we propose that R301C should be considered a novel allele of the E locus, which we have termed eA for “e ancient red”. Phenotype analysis of owner-provided dog pictures reveals that the eA allele has an impact on coat color and is recessive to wild type E and dominant to the e alleles. In dominant black (KB/*) dogs it can prevent the phenotypic expression of the K locus, and the expressed coat color is solely determined by the A locus. In the absence of dominant black, eA/eA and eA/e genotypes result in the coat color patterns referred to in their respective breed communities as domino in Alaskan Malamute and other Spitz breeds, grizzle in Chihuahua, and pied in Beagle.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a large genotype screening effort to identify the frequency and distribution of the MC1R R301C variant, one of the earliest mutations captured by canine domestication, and citizen science empowered characterization of its impact on coat color.

Background

Coat color in dogs is determined by expression of two melanin pigments, eumelanin (black/brown) and pheomelanin (yellow/red) and by spatial and temporal regulation of these pigments’ expression in the body and in the individual hair shaft. Melanocortin 1 Receptor (MC1R), known as the E locus, represents the key signaling molecule on melanocytes inducing expression of enzymes responsible for eumelanin synthesis. The alleles in order of dominance at the E locus are: EM (melanistic mask) > EG (grizzle/domino) > E (wild type) > e1–3 (recessive red) [1,2,3,4,5]. The e1–3 variants result in loss of gene function and consequently for dogs with the genotype e/e only pheomelanin (yellow/red) pigment is present. The allelic variant e1 is common and found in a wide variety of dog breeds [4, 6], while the e2 and e3 alleles represent rare additional e variants found in Australian Cattle Dogs and white Alaskan and Siberian Huskies [1], respectively. The EG allele is one of the rarest trait-associated alleles present in dogs, requiring specific genotype combinations at more than one locus in order to produce a domino or grizzle phenotype. This phenotype has been characterized in Afghan Hounds and Salukis only [3, 6]. Agouti Signaling Protein (ASIP) gene, known as the A locus, is an inverse agonist of MC1R inhibiting eumelanogenesis and promoting pheomelanogenesis. Four known alleles in order of dominance are ay (fawn) > aw (wolf sable) > at (tan point) > a (recessive black) [7,8,9]; of these aw is considered the wild type ASIP allele. The most dominant allele ay represents a gain-of-function mutation causing an increased expression of pheomelanin, whereas the alleles recessive to wild type show reduced-function and increased expression of eumelanin [8]. There is variable expression of dark hairs in ay fawn dogs; when no dark hairs are present the ay fawn appears similar to recessive red, while abundant display of dark hairs produces an ay phenotype highly similar to the wild type. Such variable expression of ASIP expression and phenotype could be due to epigenetic mechanisms as shown in mice [10, 11]. In addition, combinations of more than two allelic variants at the A locus were identified, with variable phenotypic manifestation, in a small number of dog breeds [12]. The canine beta-Defensin 103 (CBD103) gene, known as the K locus, is a neutral antagonist of MC1R. The dominant KB (dominant black) allele prevents ASIP inhibition enabling high levels of basal receptor activity resulting in solid eumelanin coat color. Similarly, a phenotypically intermediate kbr allele (brindle) of the K locus produces dominantly overlaying eumelanin stripes on A locus determined background [13, 14]. In the presence of ky (wild type) allele of the K locus, the A locus is expressed normally. The phenotypic expression of the A and K loci is dependent on the presence of at least one functional MC1R allele, and are not expressed in the presence of an e/e genotype. Coat color variation in dogs and various other domesticated species is a result of domestication and intentional selection of novel phenotypes by humans and neither is explained by relaxation of natural selection [15].

Coat color variation represent one of the first effects of domestication, where the selection for novel non-camouflage coat colors may have helped identification and tracking of animals in husbandry, differentiation of domesticated animals from wild herds, or be explained by human attraction for novelty [16]. Experiments have also shown that selection for animal behavior, especially tameness, also results in alterations in physical traits including color [17]. In dogs the R301C variant of MC1R and the dominant black KB allele of the CBD103 gene were both found in the DNA of over 10,000 years old Siberian and South-Eastern European dogs [18]. Only dog-like samples and no wolf-like samples were found to carry R301C or the KB allele suggesting that these variants could represent some of the first coat color variants present at the time of early dog domestication [18]. While the R301C variant has been found in two modern day breeds the Alaskan Malamute and the Siberian Husky, its phenotypic impact could not be determined [18]. Potential reduced-function was postulated based on functional characterization of a mutation at the same codon position (301) together with two other polymorphisms found in 43,000 years old woolly mammoth that resulted in nearly complete loss of basal activity and ~ 65% reduction in efficacy to agonists alpha-Melanocyte Stimulating Hormone (α-MSH) [19].

The aim of this study was to utilize the potential of commercial genetic panel screening to genotype large numbers of dogs for the presence or absence of the R301C variant of MC1R found in prehistoric dogs to better understand its frequency and distribution in modern dog breeds. To further unravel the potential influence of R301C, coat color variant genotypes were correlated with the dog’s actual coat color phenotype from photos provided by dog owners.

Results

Ancient R301C variant of the MC1R gene is present in various breeds of today

To screen for the presence and frequency of the ancient R301C variant of MC1R in today’s canine population, 11,750 dog samples were genotyped as a part of a custom-designed microarray panel test commercially available as MyDogDNA™/Optimal Selection™ Canine Genetic Breeding Analysis. The R301C variant was present in a total of 265 tested dogs representing 35 different breeds and breed varieties as well as mixed breed dogs. The allele frequency for R301C in all dogs representing 304 different breeds and mixed breeds was 1.5% (N = 11,750; Fig. 1 and Table S1). The R301C frequency in the tested Alaskan Malamute population was 100%. The additional 34 breeds in which the R301C variant was found could be classified into old Nordic Spitzes (East-Siberian Laika, Finnish Lapphund, Finnish Spitz, Karelian Bear Dog, Lapponian Herder, Nordic Spitz, Siberian Husky, West-Siberian Laika), other Primitive Spitz Type dogs (Basenji, Cirneco Dell’Etna, Kritikos Lagonikos, Peruvian Hairless Dog – Large, Medium and Miniature), Scent Hounds (Basset Fauve de Bretagne, Beagle, Drever, English Foxhound, Finnish Hound, Hungarian Hound, Plott, Serbian Hound), one gundog breed (Chesapeake Bay Retriever), one guardian dog breed (Pyrenean Mastiff), three Companion and Toy Dog breeds (Chihuahua, Chinese Crested Dog, Phalene),some recently created breeds (Alaskan Husky, Alaskan Klee Kai, Chinook, Northern Inuit, Tamaskan Dog, Saarlooswolfdog), and a nearly extinct sheepdog of the Auvergne region in France (Berger d’Auvergne). In this study sample the R301C variant was not found in dog breeds with Eastern Asian origin (Akita, Chow Chow, Hokkaido, Kai, Kishu, Shar Pei, Shiba, Shikoku, Korean Jindo Dog) or Middle Eastern/Central Asian origin (Afghan Hound, Saluki, Tibetan Mastiff, Tibetan Spaniel, Tibetan Terrier, Lhasa Apso, Shih-Tzu, Central Asian Ovcharka).

Fig. 1
figure1

Allele frequency of the R301C variant in 35 breeds and breed varieties. The black line indicates the allele frequency of R301C in each breed or breed variety. The number of dogs in each breed analyzed for the presence of the R301C variant is indicated after the breed label

Full size image

R301C is a novel alternative allele of the E locus

To elucidate the relationship of R301C and other known E locus variants, genotypes were obtained for EM (melanistic mask), EG (grizzle/domino) and e1 (recessive red) alleles of the MC1R gene. Two rare additional recently characterized e allelic variants [1]; e2 discovered in Australian Cattle Dog and e3 discovered in Siberian Husky were not genotyped as a part of this study. The R301C variant and the tested E locus variants showed no linkage disequilibrium in the 262 dogs with diverse breed background in which it was found present. The R301C variant was not present in dogs with two copies of the tested E locus variants; EM, EG or e1, while in dogs with two copies of the R301C variant no EM, EG or e1 variants were present. Also, no more than one copy of EM or e1 variants was present when one copy of R301C was found. The rarest MC1R coat color variant, the EG allele, is only found in one of the dog breeds, Kritikos Lagonikos, in which R301C was identified. However, in this study sample no individuals carrying both EG and R301C variants were identified.

Notably, using current conventional practices for calling of E locus genotypes at commercial genotyping laboratories, dogs carrying R301C would have been interpreted as carrying E. As our findings suggested that R301C rather represents an independent alternative allele at the E locus, we refer to it as eA (for ancient red e) for clarity hereafter.

eA allele of MC1R explains presence of domino patterning in Tamaskan dog

To interpret the phenotypic impact of the R301C variant, eA, on the dog’s coat color, also genotypes for Canine Beta-Defensin 103 (CBD103) and Agouti Signaling Protein (ASIP) were obtained for the analysis. Color phenotypes were available for 125 (47%) dogs of the 265 dogs identified with one or two copies of the eA allele in this study. Phenotyping using dog owner-provided photos initially focused on the Tamaskan Dog breed, which represented 35% (N = 43) of the dogs with phenotype information available. These dogs were carefully examined to elucidate the potential phenotypic effect of eA within a single breed. The expected coat colors for these dogs were aw wolf sable, at tan point or a recessive black determined by their A locus (due to only wild type variant ky being present on the K locus of these dogs). A maximum copy number of two allelic variants at the A locus was found in any of the Tamaskan Dogs and no ay variant, indicating that no A locus anomalies were present as recently observed in a small number of other dog breeds [12]. The observed coat color phenotypes were in concordance with expected phenotypes for 26 of the Tamaskan Dogs, while 17 of the Tamaskan Dogs manifested more abundantly pheomelanic hairs in areas of head, legs and body on which the coat color pattern known as “domino” or “grizzle” is formed. This patterning, which is commonly observed in the two arctic breeds Alaskan Malamute and Siberian Husky, bears high phenotypic resemblance to previously characterized EG domino in Afghan Hound and EG grizzle in Saluki. The aforementioned have been suggested to be dependent on the A locus at/at genotype for their manifestation [3]. Here, the domino pattern is observed independently from EG on divergent breed backgrounds (Fig. 2). Domino phenotype encompasses pale facial markings with receded eumelanin line forming a widow’s peak in the forehead, and often also white markings expressed up the centerline of the face including reduced pigment in the centerline of the nose referred to as a dudley nose. The latter phenotypic feature (white markings and a dudley nose) is also common in recessive red dogs. Notably, two dogs expected to manifest solid black coat as a result of a/a genotype on their A locus also showed lightened body coat color with tan point like markings that were very profound in the newborn puppy, while the coat phenotype resembled wild sable or tan point in the adult recessive black dog (Fig. 2 and Fig. 3; u- x).

Fig. 2
figure2

The eA allele associated domino pattern is recessive to the wild type E allele. Mating of recessive red (cream colored) e1/e1 sire to E/eA wolf sable dam in the Tamaskan Dog breed, resulting in four normal wolf sable puppies with E/e1 genotype and four puppies with domino pattern, of which two express domino on wolf sable and two express domino on recessive black. In newborns, domino pattern is visible as large pheomelanin colored areas on both sides of the muzzle, pheomelanin areas around the eyes and overall as a lighter coat color of the body with dark bar of hair remaining on the back side around the vertebra

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure3

Photos representing the phenotypic impact of the eA allele. The eA/eA and eA/e1 genotypes mask the presence of KB (or kbr) at the K locus to produce phenotypes representing the dogs A locus genotype; ay fawn in Cirneco dell’Etna (a) and in Drever (b); differing from the rare KB solid eumelanin shade in Cirneco dell’Etna (in which the eumelanin shade is brown due to variants in the TYRP1 gene) (c); or kbr brindle patterning displayed in Plott (d); a saddle tan modified at tan point in mixed breed dog (e-f) instead of solid dominant black in Labrador Retriever (g). The eA phenotype in dogs expressing patterns of the A locus ay fawn; is cream in Berger d’Auvergne (h-i) and domino in Finnish Lapphund (j) compared to fawn in Berger d’Auvergne (k) and heavily shaded fawn in Finnish Lapphund (l); aw wolf sable also presents as color pattern domino in Siberian Husky (m) and in a mixed breed dog (n), compared to typical wolf sable in Siberian Husky (o) and in mixed breed dog (p); similarly at tan point shows a color pattern called “grizzle” in Chihuahua (q) or reduced saddle tan patterning called “pied” in Beagle (r); (j) compared to normal tan points in Chihuahua (s) or typical saddle tan patterning in Beagle (t); a recessive black dog manifests tan points with pale hair root in Alaskan Klee Kai (u-v) or wolf sable in Tamaskan Dog (w) instead of uniform recessive black in German Shepherd Dog (x). Taken together, ancient red eA phenotypes manifest as a wide variety of partial recessive red coat colors expressing less eumelanin compared to dogs with wild type E, while no eumelanin is expressed in e recessive red exemplified by a Cirneco dell’Etna (y)

Full size image

The 26 non-domino Tamaskan Dogs had one copy of the R301C variant in combination with either one copy of the E or EM variant. Presence of two copies of the R301C variant (N = 4), or compound heterozygosity of eA with e recessive red (N = 13), showed statistically significant association with domino phenotype (P = 2.37− 12) (Table 1). The phenotypic impact of the eA allele - recessivity to wild type E and dominance to e - is further demonstrated in a litter of Tamaskan Dogs (Fig. 2). Thirty-nine additional Tamaskan Dogs without any copies of the eA allele manifested a non-domino phenotype, suggesting that the eA allele explains the presence of all domino phenotypes observed in Tamaskan Dog.

Table 1 E locus genotype results in Tamaskan Dog and their association with domino phenotype
Full size table

eA allele of MC1R is associated with partial recessive red phenotypes in multiple breeds

After associating the eA allele with a coat color phenotype within a single breed, we pursued characterization of the phenotypic impact of the eA allele across different breeds and coat color genotypes. Examination of additional dog owner-provided photos revealed that the eA allele is associated with apparent partial recessive red coat color patterning. The coat color phenotype was altered in all 70 dogs (including the 17 Tamaskan Dog study sample) with the eA allele present in homozygous form (N = 35) or in heterozygous form paired with the recessive red e1 allele (N = 35). These phenotypes manifested in dogs with eA/eA and eA/e1 genotypes as follows. All seven dogs with eA/eA or eA/e1 and KB (or alternatively the intermediate kbr) on the K locus express a non-solid and non-striped eumelanin shade phenotype (Table 2, Table S2 and Fig. 3; a-g). In five out of seven dogs, three Cirneco dell’Etna’s and two Drevers (a breed in which the striped kbr brindle pattern is observed), the phenotype is clear fawn and virtually indistinguishable from recessive red e1/e1 (Table 2, Table S2 and Fig. 3; a-b and y). Of the remaining two KB dogs, one Siberian Husky is wolf sable and one mixed breed dog is tan point (modified into saddle tan) (Table 2, Table S2, Fig. 3; e-f). Given that the five clear fawn dogs have ay/ay genotype, the wolf sable dog has aw/at genotype and the mixed breed has at/a genotype on the A locus, we conclude that these dogs express the coat color pattern of their A locus despite the presence of one copy of dominant variant on the K locus.

Table 2 Summary of the eA phenotypes
Full size table

Altogether all 63 dogs with eA/e1 or eA/eA genotype expressing A locus manifested altered phenotype (Table 2 and Table S2). Of 49 out of 56 dogs with eA/e1 or eA/eA genotype expressing A locus ay fawn, aw wolf sable, at tan point produced domino color patterning, but in all of the 56 dogs with eA genotype resulted in increase of pheomelanin expression. One of the four ay fawn dogs manifested domino patterning on eumelanin shaded fawn phenotype, whereas three dogs with eA/e1 or eA/eA genotype combined with ay fawn were phenotypically similar to recessive red e/e dogs..All of the 40 aw wolf sample dogs had domino patterning. Typical domino patterning was also manifested in eight of the 12 at tan point dogs, while in four out of 12 at tan point dogs variation in the level of pheomelanin expression was observed.. One Drever homozygous for the eA allele had no visible increase in its coat color pheomelanin expression; the dog expresses normal tan points, but also the white markings on the centerline of the face and a dudley nose. In contrast, almost no eumelanin pigment is present in two Hungarian Hounds with eA/e1 genotype manifesting rich red coat color with white markings on the centerline of the face and a dudley nose (Table 2, Table S2). Moreover, in one at tan point Beagle in which tan point coat color modifier Saddle Tan [20] is present, the ‘saddle’ consists of only a few eumelanic hairs and the dog manifests a dudley nose (Fig. 3; r). This resulting coat color phenotype in the Beagle breed is called as “pied”, and we now demonstrate it to be caused by eA ancient red. In addition, all seven out of seven a recessive black dogs had pheomelanic markings despite of the loss-of-function a variantresulting in coat phenotypes resembling tan point or wolf sable (Table 2, Table S2, Fig. 3; h-i and u-w).

We observed no phenotype change in 52 dogs genotyped EM/eA (N = 16) or E/eA (N = 37) strongly suggesting an allelic hierarchy in which eA is recessive to EM and E and dominant to e, while further information on phenotypes produced by EG/eA genotype remains to be collected (Table 2 and Table S2). In two Siberian Huskies with one copy of eA and no other tested E alleles present the phenotype was altered to domino as if no wild type E was present. We did not have DNA availability to test for the presence of a rare e3 variant discovered in Huskies [1], but we hypothesize that the actual genotype of these dogs is eA/e3 based on the observed phenotype.

Taken together, phenotype data available in 15 different breeds consistently shows that eA results in various increased pheomelanin pigment-containing phenotypes that we interpret to be partial recessive red coat colors. In dogs with KB dominant black or kbr genotype, the K locus is masked and A locus is expressed instead, while in dogs expressing the A locus (in the absence of KB variant) the ability to produce eumelanin is reduced resulting in coat color patterns known by the names “domino”, “grizzle” and “pied” depending on the breed background, but may also result in phenotypes indistinguishable from recessive red (cream), tan point or wolf sable.

Discussion

Various MC1R gene polymorphisms have been documented and associated with pigment variation in human and domestic animals, and several coat color associated MC1R polymorphisms have already been identified in dogs. The goal of this study was to screen for the presence of an ancient R301C variant in today’s dog population and determine if it has any effect on coat color phenotypes putatively selected for during the early stages of domestication. The R301C variant of MC1R was first identified in over 10,000-year-old prehistoric dog DNA samples as a variant absent from wolf DNA samples [18]. Our study sample consisted of nearly 12,000 samples representing over 300 modern dog breeds and breed varieties which were genotyped for the presence of R301C and known coat color alleles as a part of a commercial genetic testing service (MyDogDNA™/Optimal Selection™). We confirm presence of the R301C variant in 35 dog breeds with a variant frequency of 1.5% in all dogs genotyped. A frequency of 50% or higher for R301C was observed in Spitz breeds (Alaskan Klee Kai, Northern Inuit Dog, Siberian Husky), and in Hound breeds (Drever, English Foxhound, Plott and Serbian Hound).

Phenotype analysis combined known coat color variant genotypes for MC1R, CBD103 and ASIP genes with phenotype information from photos provided by the owners of the tested dogs. R301C was not found to be linked with any of the tested E locus variants (EM, EG or e1). Phenotype analysis further suggests that the R301C variant is a novel reduced-function allele at the E locus, recessive to EM and wild type E, but dominant to the e allele. Further support for genetic causality is provided by the association of the identical R301C mutation in MC1R with light coat color in two additional species; alpaca and Arabian camel [21, 22]. A similar cytosine to thymine mutation at the homologous base pair position (901) resulting in an S83F amino acid change is also associated with Chestnut color in horse [23]. The R301C mutation is located in the cytosolic C-terminal extension of the protein, shown to be functionally relevant for the cell surface expression of G protein-coupled receptors like MC1R [24, 25]. We demonstrate that the newly characterized allele, which we have termed eA, impacts phenotypes regulated by the K and A loci. We observed a loss of solid eumelanin shade in KB dogs and receding eumelanin expression in color patterns produced by the A locus, and note that eA behaves as a partially recessive red variant. The most recognizable eA produced phenotype pattern in aw wolf sable, at tan point and also in some ay fawn dogs has been referred to as ‘Husky domino’ seen in Alaskan Malamute or Siberian Husky, but the molecular cause for this phenotype has remained unknown until now. Also, we now demonstrate that eA is producing the coat color phenotype called “pied” in Beagle. For eA phenotype to be expressed this variant allele of E locus needs to be present in homozygous form or in heterozygous form with e as the second allele. We observed two Siberian Huskies manifesting a domino phenotype while carrying one copy of eA and no other tested E locus variant, which according to current conventions would be interpreted as wild type E being the second allele at the locus in these dogs. Although we did not have DNA sample availability to test for the presence of the recently discovered additional e alleles, e2 and especially e3 discovered in Huskies [1], we suggest that an eA/e3 genotype is the most likely explanation for the domino phenotype in these dogs.

We propose that the newly characterized reduced-function variant R301C is designated eA, where “e” is chosen for its partial recessive red identity and “A” is denoting “Ancient” that is recessive to E wild type and dominant to the e1–3 alleles. We propose an updated dominance hierarchy at the E locus; EM > E > eA > e1–3, while acknowledging that we could not identify any dog with the EG/eA genotype and thus, the phenotype impact of this specific rare genotype combination remains unexplored. Interestingly, the previously identified domino variant EG is almost exclusively observed in breeds in which eA is not detected [6]. In this study, we found both EG and eA allele present in only one breed, Kritikos Lagonikos; a primitive hunting dog originating from the Greek island of Crete. Phenotype analysis of this rare breed might help to resolve the phenotypes presented by rare allele combinations, for which conclusions could not be made through this study.

Based on our phenotype analysis, common to eA associated patterning is an characteristically increased expression of pheomelanin and decrease in the level of eumelanin expression, indicating that eA represents a reduced-function variant of MC1R as postulated [18]. It is plausible that reduced-function of MC1R manifests as the partial recessive red phenotypes enabling some eumelanin to be expressed as observed by us, while other previously characterized recessive red alleles e1–3 represent loss-of-function variants of MC1R enabling expression of pheomelanin only when present in two copies. Consequently, e/e dogs always only express pheomelanin pigment regardless of variants present at the K locus and A locus, whereas the R301C variant eA results in reduced MC1R function masking expression of the K locus in dominant black dogs while pigmentation phenotypes correlated with the expression pattern of the A locus. Logically on the other hand, increased pheomelanin expression is observed in dogs expressing the A locus due to the effects of eA. We propose that the eA variant is a partial loss-of-function variant not previously known to be present in dogs, which furthermore provides novel insights into the relationship of variants at the E, K and A loci. The dominant allele of the K locus (a neutral antagonist of MC1R acting epistatic to the A locus when the e/e genotype is not present [13]) needs a more functional variant of the E locus for uniform eumelanin pigmentation than the level of functionality inherent to the eA variant. In contrast, ASIP, an inverse agonist of MC1R, retains its function in the presence of the less functional eA variant. Thus, it is suggested that in the presence of eA/eA and eA/e1 genotypes, a reverse epistasis relationship between K and A locus occurs. Interestingly, the effect of eA in genetically a recessive black dogs results in wild type or tan point-like patterning similar to aw and at phenotypes. This allows us to postulate that also the a variant loss-of-function phenotype is dependent on the specifics of the MC1R variant type, where interaction with the eA variant may be able to restore some of its function. Alternatively, this may be indicative of a potential non-causal role for the R96C variant in expression of the recessive black phenotype in dogs.

While partial recessive red phenotypes are produced by eA/eA or eA/e1 genotypes, two copies of the reduced- function allele eA could allow a bit more eumelanin to be expressed than when the eA allele is present with a loss of function allele e1. We observed a Drever with eA/eA genotype expressing normal tan points with only reduced pigment in the centerline of the head (white star) and nose (dudley nose), respectively. Outside of this study sample, we have further observed full domino pattern present in this dog’s offspring with eA/e1 genotype. The most depleted eumelanin expression was observed in two Hungarian Hounds with eA/e1 genotype and at/at genotype for tan points in the A locus; these two dogs were essentially indistinguishable from recessive red individuals of the same breed. In addition, it should be noted that the domino pattern in all ay fawn dogs is not clearly visible and their phenotype is similar to recessive red.

Substantial variation in pigment phenotypes in human populations is also explained by MC1R polymorphisms, where reduced-function variants are present in both Europeans and Asians. It is commonly believed that these variants represent adaptation to higher latitudes enabling sufficient synthesis of D-vitamin under lower solar radiation, while the population-genetic analysis suggests relaxed functional constraints out of Africa and South-Asia to explain the MC1R polymorphisms in human [26]. In dogs that rely on nutritional intake of D-vitamin and do not show seasonal variation in serum D-vitamin concentrations [27], MC1R polymorphisms are unlikely to associate with D-vitamin intake. A more plausible explanation for increase in frequency of a phenotype changing variant early in the domestication process is positive selection of novel traits applied by humans [15, 16]. Confirming eA being the major variant in some old Spitz and Hound type dogs bred mostly for utility suggests that R301C may have once been a common variant in the domesticated dog population that has become eradicated in more modern breeds to enable manifestation of other coat color phenotype associated variants.

MC1R is not only central to determination of pigment phenotype. Besides its role in stimulation of eumelanin synthesis to protect skin from UV radiation and DNA damage, MC1R has a physiological role in vascular homeostasis and cell migration [28], erythroblast differentiation [29], prevention of cartilage degradation [30], and dopaminergic neuron survival [31]. MC1R signaling activates antioxidant, DNA repair and anti-inflammatory pathways [32,33,34]. MC1R genotype affects the probability of developing malignant melanoma [35], nonmelanoma skin cancer [35,36,37], risk for developing complicated sepsis after trauma [38] and development of Parkinson’s disease [31, 39, 40] in humans. Loss- or reduced-function variants in human MC1R have also been investigated in the response to pain, analgesia and anesthetics [41,42,43,44]. Moreover, in Standard Poodle the e1/e1reduced-function variants in human genotype has been shown to prevent clinical signs of disease in dogs carrying causal variant causing Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Digit (SCCD) [45]. Further work is needed to establish the molecular effect of the reduced-function variant R301C, and to understand its potential effects in dogs beyond determining coat color pigmentation.

In summary, genotype to phenotype correlation characterizes a novel allele of the E locus, caused by an old polymorphism in the MC1R gene associated with reduced eumelanin pigment that potentially represents one of the earliest mutations enriched by canine domestication still present in the dog population. This ancient E locus variant (MC1R p. R301C), which we have designated as eA, is recessive to EM and E alleles of the E locus and dominant to the e allele. The genotypes eA/e and eA/eA result in phenotypically reduced expression of eumelanin, and these genotypes exhibit partial epistasis over the A locus expression pattern and epistasis over the K locus.

Conclusions

This study represents a large genotype screening effort of pet dogs, aiming to identify the presence of and understand the potential effect of one of the earliest mutations captured by canine domestication. It underscores the crucial role of dog owners in citizen science and more specifically in supporting studies aiming to elucidate the genetic background of trait phenotypes. The present discoveries could only have been made by comprehensive screening of coat color variants across a large number of breeds and individuals, in combination with the openness of dog owners to submit pictures of their dogs for research purposes. In conclusion, our findings explain the non-eumelanin coat color phenotypes observed in some dogs despite presence of the dominant black allele on the K locus, and identify that the same molecular cause explains the coat color phenotype commonly referred to as “domino” in Alaskan Malamute and other Spitz breeds, “grizzle” in Chihuahua, and “pied” in Beagle.

Methods

Study sample

The study sample (N = 11,750) consisted of non-invasive cheek swab samples collected by dog owners, and either blood or cheek swab samples collected at certified veterinary clinics in accordance with international standards for animal care and research as a part of voluntary submission of samples to commercial DNA testing. In addition, the dog owners provided consent for the use of their dog’s DNA information for research purposes. The samples were submitted for MyDogDNA / Optimal Selection analysis at Genoscoper Laboratories (Helsinki, Finland) and Wisdom Health (formerly Mars Veterinary) between April 3rd, 2015 and June 23th, 2020. Most of the tested dogs were from Finland (N = 5005, 42.6%) and the United States (N = 3192, 27.2%). The other major subgroups were formed by dogs from the Netherlands (N = 774, 6.6%), Denmark (N = 598, 5.1%), Austria (N = 413, 3.5%), France (N = 300, 2.6%), UK (N = 290, 2.5%),, Sweden (N = 164, 1.4%) and Australia (N = 121, 1.0%). Most of the tested dogs were from breeds recognized by Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI) or American Kennel Club (AKC), and the breed of the dog was reported by its owner with accompanying registration information. A few additional breeds not yet recognized by any major breed registry but with an established number of breed hobbyists, and mixed breed dogs, were also included in the study sample. Altogether, it amounted to 304 breeds and breed varieties, and 391 dogs representing the mixed breed population.

Genotyping

Genotyping of coat color gene variants of MC1R [2,3,4,5], CBD103 [13, 14] and ASIP [7,8,9] loci, and the R301C variant of the MC1R gene was carried out according to manufacturer-recommended standard protocols on a custom-designed Illumina Infinium technology bead chip ( [46, 47], Illumina, San Diego, Ca, USA). The genotyping quality control measures for this platform were previously described in [46, 47]. For the purposes of this study, the R301C variant assay findings were additionally validated with a second genetic technology by Sanger sequencing in representatives of the breed Finnish Lapphund and Cirneco dell’Etna on a ABI3730xl DNA Analyzer platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at the Finnish Institute of Molecular Medicine (FIMM) Sequencing Unit as described earlier in [46]. Primers used for sequencing of the R301C locus were: 5- ACACTCACTATCCTGCTGGG − 3 (forward) and 5-TATTCCTTTCTCTGGCCCCA-3 (reverse).

Phenotypic association

Coat color phenotype analysis utilized customer provided photos of dogs where the evaluator of the dog’s phenotype was blind to the genotype. The phenotypic impact of the R301C variant was evaluated by considering the genotypes for R301C in conjunction with genotypes at the interacting coat color loci MC1R, ASIP and CBD103.

Statistical analyses

The statistical significance of differences in the distribution of eA variant between observed domino and non-domino phenotypes inside one breed (Tamaskan Dog) was evaluated with the Freeman-Halton extension of Fisher’s Exact Probability test for a 2 × 3 table [48]. Dogs with one copy of eA and an EM variant were combined with dogs carrying eA with an E variant due to only one individual present in the aforementioned category.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data is provided with the paper and its Supporting Information files.

References

  1. 1.

    Dürig N, Letko A, Lepori V, Hadji Rasouliha S, Loechel R, Kehl A, et al. Two MC1R loss-of-function alleles in cream-coloured Australian Cattle Dogs and white Huskies. Anim Genet. 2018;49(4):284–90.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Newton JM, Wilkie AL, He L, Jordan SA, Metallinos DL, Holmes NG, et al. Melanocortin 1 receptor variation in the domestic dog. Mamm Genome. 2000;11(1):24–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Dreger DL, Schmutz SM. A new mutation in MC1R explains a coat color phenotype in 2 “old” breeds: Saluki and Afghan Hound. J Hered. 2010;101(5):644–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schmutz SM, Berryere TG, Ellinwood NM, Kerns JA, Barsh GS. MCIR Studies in Dogs with Melanistic Mask or Brindle Patterns. J Hered. 2003;94(1):69–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Everts RE, Rothuizen J, Van Oost BA. Identification of a premature stop codon in the melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor gene (MC1R) in Labrador and Golden retrievers with yellow coat colour. Anim Genet. 2000;31(3):194–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Dreger DL, Hooser BN, Hughes AM, Ganesan B, Donner J, Anderson H, et al. True Colors: Commercially-acquired morphological genotypes reveal hidden allele variation among dog breeds, informing both trait ancestry and breed potential. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kerns JA, Newton J, Berryere TG, Rubin EM, Cheng JF, Schmutz SM, et al. Characterization of the dog Agouti gene and a nonagouti mutation in German Shepherd Dogs. Mamm Genome. 2004;15(10):798–808.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Berryere TG, Kerns JA, Barsh GS, Schmutz SM. Association of an Agouti allele with fawn or sable coat color in domestic dogs. Mamm Genome. 2005;16(4):262–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dreger DL, Schmutz SM. A SINE Insertion Causes the Black-and-Tan and Saddle Tan Phenotypes in Domestic Dogs. J Hered. 2011;104(3):399–406.

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dolinoy DC. The agouti mouse model: An epigenetic biosensor for nutritional and environmental alterations on the fetal epigenome. Nutr Rev. 2008;66(Suppl.1):7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Michaud EJ, van Vugt MJ, Bultman SJ, Sweet HO, Davisson MT, Woychik RP. Differential expression of a new dominant agouti allele (A(iapy)) is correlated with methylation state and is influenced by parental lineage. Genes Dev. 1994;8(12):1463–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dreger DL, Anderson H, Donner J, Clark JA, Dykstra A, Hughes AM, et al. Atypical genotypes for canine agouti signaling protein suggest novel chromosomal rearrangement. Genes. 2020;11(7):739.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Candille SI, Kaelin CB, Cattanach BM, Yu B, Thompson DA, Nix MA, et al. A β-defensin mutation causes black coat color in domestic dogs. Science. 2007;318(5855):1418–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Kerns JA, Cargill EJ, Clark LA, Candille SI, Berryere TG, Olivier M, et al. Linkage and segregation analysis of black and brindle coat color in domestic dogs. Genetics. 2007;176(3):1679–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Linderholm A, Larson G. The role of humans in facilitating and sustaining coat colour variation in domestic animals. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013;24(6–7):587–93.

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Fang M, Larson G, Ribeiro HS, Li N, Andersson L. Contrasting mode of evolution at a coat color locus in wild and domestic pigs. PLoS Genet. 2009;1(1):e1000341.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Trut L, Oskina I, Kharlamova A. Animal evolution during domestication: the domesticated fox as a model. BioEssays. 2009;31(3):349–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ollivier M, Tresset A, Hitte C, Petit C, Hughes S, Gillet B, et al. Evidence of Coat Color Variation Sheds New Light on Ancient Canids. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e75110.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Römpler H, Rohland N, Lalueza-Fox C, Willerslev E, Kuznetsova T, Rebeder G, Bertranpetit J, Schöneberg T, Hofreiter M. Nuclear Gene Indicates Coat-Color Polymorphism in Mammoths. Science. 2006;313(5783):62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dreger DL, Parker HG, Ostrander EA, Schmutz SM. Identification of a mutation that is associated with the saddle tan and black-and-tan phenotypes in Basset Hounds and Pembroke Welsh Corgis. J Hered. 2013;104(3):399–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Feeley NL, Munyard K. Characterisation of the melanocortin-1 receptor gene in alpaca and identification of possible markers associated with phenotypic variations in colour. Anim Prod Sci. 2009;49(8):675–581.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Almathen F, Elbir H, Bahbahani H, Mwacharo J, Hanotte O. Polymorphisms in MC1R and ASIP Genes are Associated with Coat Color Variation in the Arabian Camel. J Hered. 2018;109(6):700–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Marklund L, Johansson M, Sandberg K, Andersson L. A missense mutation in the gene for melanocyte-stimulating hormone receptor (MC1R) is associated with the chestnut coat color in horses. Mamm Genome. 1996;7:895–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    García-Borrón JC, Sánchez-Laorden BL, Jiménez-Cervantes C. Melanocortin-1 receptor structure and functional regulation. Pigment Cell Res. 2005;18(6):393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Sanchez-Mas J, Sanchez-Laorden BL, Guillo LA, Garcia-Borron J. The melanocortin-1 receptor carboxyl terminal pentapeptide is essential for MC1R function and expression on the cell surface. Peptides. 2005;26(10):1848–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Harding RM, Healy E, Ray AJ, Ellis NS, Flanagan N, Todd C, et al. Evidence for variable selective pressures at MC1R. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66(4):1351–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Laing CJ, Malik R, Wigney DI, Fraser D. Seasonal vitamin D status of greyhounds in Sydney. Aust Vet J. 1999;77:35–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Saporiti F, Piacentini L, Alfieri V, Bono E, Ferrari F, Chiesa M, et al. Melanocortin-1 receptor positively regulates human artery endothelial cell migration. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2019;52(6):1339–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Simamura E, Arikawa T, Ikeda T, Shimada H, Shoji H, Masuta H, et al. Melanocortins contribute to sequential differentiation and enucleation of human erythroblasts via melanocortin receptors 1, 2 and 5. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lorenz J, Seebach E, Hackmayer G, Greth C, Bauer RJ, Kleinschmidt K, et al. Melanocortin 1 receptor-signaling deficiency results in an articular cartilage phenotype and accelerates pathogenesis of surgically induced murine osteoarthritis. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e105858.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Chen X, Chen H, Cai W, Maguire M, Ya B, Zuo F, Logan R, Li H, Robinson K, VanderBurg CR, Yu Y, Wang Y, Fisher DE, Schwartzchild MA. The Melanoma-Linked “Redhead” MC1R Influences Dopaminergic Neuron Survival. Ann Neorol. 2017;81(3):395–406.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mountjoy KJ, Robbins LS, Mortrud MT, Cone RD. The Cloning of a Family of Genes That Encode the Melanocortin Receptors. Science (80- ). 1992;275(5074):1248–51.

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Swope V, Alexander C, Starner R, Schwemberger S, Babcock G, Abdel-Malek ZA. Significance of the Melanocortin 1 Receptor in the DNA Damage Response of Human Melanocytes to Ultraviolet Radiation. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2014;4:601–10.

    Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kadekaro AL, Leachman S, Kavanagh RJ, Swope V, Cassidy P, Supp D, Santor M, Schwemberger S, Babcock G, Wakamatsu K, Ito S, Koshoffer A, Boissy RE, Manga P, Sturm RZA. Melanocortin 1 receptor genotype: an important determinant of the damage response of melanocytes to ultraviolet radiation. FASEB J. 2010;10:3850–60.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Tagliabue E, Gandini S, Bellocco R, Maisonneuve P, Newton-Bishop J, Polsky D, et al. MC1R variants as melanoma risk factors independent of at-risk phenotypic characteristics: A pooled analysis from the M-SKIP project. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:1143–54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Box NF, Duffy DL, Irving RE, Russell A, Chen W, Griffyths LR, et al. Melanocortin-1 receptor genotype is a risk factor for basal and squamous cell carcinoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2001;116(2):224–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Binstock M, Hafeez F, Metchinikoff C, Arron ST. Signle-nucleotide polymorhphisms in pigment genes and nonmelanoma skin cancer predisposition: a systematic review. BJD. 2014;171(4):713–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Seaton ME, Parent BA, Sood RF, Wurfel MM, Muffley LA, Gibran NS. Melanocortin-1 Receptor Polymorphisms and the Risk of Complicated Sepsis After Trauma : A Candidate Gene Assiocation Study. Shock. 2017;47(1):79–85.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chen X, Feng D, Schwarzschild MA, Gao X. Red hair, MC1R variants, and risk for Parkinson’s disease - a meta-analysis. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017;4(3):212–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gao X, Simon KC, HanmJiali, Schwarzschild MA, Ascherio A. Genetic determinants of hair color and Parkinson’s disease risk Xiang. Ann Neorol. 2009;65(1):76–82.

    Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Liem EB, Lin CM, Suleman MI, Doufas AG, Gregg RG, Veauthier JM, et al. Anesthetic requirement is increased in redheads. Anesthesiology. 2004;101(2):279–83.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Liem EB, Joiner TV, Tsueda K, Sessler DI. Increased sensitivity to thermal pain and reduced subcutaneous lidocaine efficacy in redheads. Anesthesiology. 2005;102(3):509–14.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mogil JS, Ritchie J, Smith SB, Strasburg K, Kaplan L, Wallace MR, et al. Melanocortin-1 receptor gene variants affect pain and μ-opioid analgesia in mice and humans. J Med Genet. 2005;42(7):583–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Delaney A, Keighren M, Fleetwood-Walker SM, Jackson IJ. Involvement of the melanocortin-1 receptor in acute pain and pain of inflammatory but not neuropathic origin. PLoS One. 2010;5(9):1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Karyadi DM, Karlins E, Decker B, vonHoldt BM, Carpintero-Ramirez G, Parker HG, et al. A Copy Number Variant at the KITLG Locus Likely Confers Risk for Canine Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Digit. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(3):e1003409.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Donner J, Kaukonen M, Anderson H, Möller F, Kyöstilä K, Sankari S, et al. Genetic panel screening of nearly 100 mutations reveals new insights into the breed distribution of risk variants for canine hereditary disorders. PLoS One. 2016;11(8):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Donner J, Anderson H, Davison S, Hughes AM, Bouirmane J, Lindqvist J, et al. Frequency and distribution of 152 genetic disease variants in over 100,000 mixed breed and purebred dogs. PLoS Genet. 2018;14(4):1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Freeman GH, Halton J. Note on exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance. Biometrika. 1951;38:141–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank, Dr. Casey Knox, Dr. Cindy Elston and Dr. Oliver Forman of Wisdom Health for their valuable comments on the manuscript and Igor Polyakov for design and assembly of figure panels. We wish to express sincere thanks to all dog owners that submitted DNA, genotypes, and phenotype data from their dogs that enable this citizen science empowered discovery. Our special gratitude goes to Debby Ignjatov of Sylvaen Tamaskans.

Funding

Wisdom Health provided support in the form of salaries for authors HA, LH, PR, JM and JD.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Wisdom Health, Helsinki, Finland

    Heidi Anderson, Leena Honkanen, Päivi Ruotanen, Julia Mathlin & Jonas Donner

Authors
  1. Heidi Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leena Honkanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Päivi Ruotanen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julia Mathlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jonas Donner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: HA, LH, PR, JM and JD. Data curation: HA, LH, PR and JD. Formal analysis and validation: HA, LH, JM and JD. Methodology: JD, HA, LH and JM. Project administration: HA and JD. Supervision: HA and JD. Visualization: HA, JM and PR. Writing – original draft: HA, LH, JM and JD. Writing – review & editing: HA, LH, JM, PR and JD. The author (s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heidi Anderson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study used DNA collected through non-invasive buccal swabbing or blood collected at certified veterinary clinics in accordance with international standards for animal care and research. The samples were voluntarily submitted for commercial genotyping, and no ethical permissions for dog handling or sampling were required.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

HA, LH, PR, JM and JD are employees of Wisdom Health that offers canine DNA testing as a commercial service.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1 Table S1.

Allele frequency of R301C variant in the study sample composition.

Additional file 2 Table S2.

Phenotype analysis of 125 dogs with known genotype for MC1R, CBD103 and ASIP loci.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anderson, H., Honkanen, L., Ruotanen, P. et al. Comprehensive genetic testing combined with citizen science reveals a recently characterized ancient MC1R mutation associated with partial recessive red phenotypes in dog. Canine Genet Epidemiol 7, 16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40575-020-00095-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Ancient
  • Canine
  • Dog
  • Coat color
  • Domino
  • Grizzle
  • Pheomelanin
  • Eumelanin
  • MC1R
  • Reduced-function variant

Canine Medicine and Genetics

ISSN: 2662-9380